Mary And Thomas Green Limited

Mary And Thomas Green Limited holds an extremely low overall trust score of 1.56 out of 10, indicating a high-risk profile. The entity is flagged for operating with a suspicious business scope and is identified as a clone entity, falsely claiming association with an FCA license belonging to another company. It lacks any valid forex trading licenses, representing a significant absence of credible regulatory oversight and client protection, making it a highly risky choice for traders.

No, Mary And Thomas Green Limited is not a regulated broker. It operates as a clone entity, meaning it has inappropriately used the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) license number 606110, which legally belongs to CPT MARKETS UK LIMITED. The broker itself does not hold any valid authoritative licenses for forex trading.

The broker requires a minimum deposit of $500 across its account types, including Platinum, Raw Spread, and STD Standard accounts.

Yes, Mary And Thomas Green Limited offers support for MetaTrader platforms, including the use of Expert Advisors (EAs).

Pros: Offers competitive floating spreads starting from 0.1 pips on its Raw Spread account. Cons: It is an unregulated entity with a severely deficient regulatory profile. Holds an extremely low trust score of 1.56/10, reflecting a high level of operational risk. Its business scope is listed as suspicious, raising significant concerns about its legitimacy and transparency.

Given its status as an unregulated entity with a suspicious business scope, there is a heightened risk associated with user complaints related to fund security and operational integrity. The WikiFX assessment, based on a very low trust score, indicates a platform where users may encounter substantial difficulties.

Due to the temporary lack of publicly available data, it is not possible to determine whether it is available in the United States. In general, to judge whether a broker can be used in a certain region, you can refer to the following aspects: 1. Regulatory qualifications: Check whether the broker is regulated by major regulators (such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the United States). 2. Legal restrictions: Different countries and regions have different laws and regulations on forex and CFD trading. Some platforms may not provide services in certain regions. 3. Account opening information: Check whether the broker allows users from that region to register accounts. 4. Official announcements and customer service: Confirm the local usage policy through the broker's official website or customer service. 5. User feedback: Refer to other users' experience and complaints in that region. You can use the information above to judge its availability in the United States. At the same time, you can follow WikiFX updates on regulatory and availability data to get more accurate reference.

Mary And Thomas Green Limited is not suitable for beginners. The primary consideration for new traders should be security and regulatory oversight, which this entity critically lacks. Its classification as an unregulated entity and its suspicious business scope introduce an unacceptable level of risk for individuals unfamiliar with the market's complexities and pitfalls.

Mary And Thomas Green Limited offers three primary account types, all requiring a $500 minimum deposit and supporting EAs, scalping, and hedging. The key differences lie in their cost structures: Raw Spread Account: Features floating spreads starting from 0.1 pips. Platinum Account: Features floating spreads starting from 0.6 pips. STD Standard Account: Features floating spreads starting from 1.8 pips. All accounts offer the same range of tradable instruments, including Forex, Commodities, Indices, Cryptocurrencies, and stocks.

Leverage specifications for Mary And Thomas Green Limited are not explicitly listed. However, the risk associated with trading with this broker is exceptionally high, irrespective of leverage levels. This assessment is based on its unregulated status, clone entity classification, and extremely low trust score of 1.56. The lack of credible oversight means client funds are not protected by any regulatory compensation scheme, fundamentally elevating all financial and operational risks.

When choosing a safe broker, investors should focus on key factors such as regulatory qualifications, fund security, and trading transparency. In general, priority should be given to platforms regulated by major regulatory authorities, such as the Financial Conduct Authority, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. At the same time, attention should also be paid to: whether client funds are kept in segregated accounts, whether the fee structure is transparent, and whether there are many negative complaints or withdrawal problems. By combining WikiFX ratings and user feedback, investors can evaluate broker risks more comprehensively.

A broker can be evaluated as a potential scam platform by considering multiple factors such as regulatory qualifications, user complaints, fund security, and platform data. In general, brokers without valid regulation, those that frequently have withdrawal problems, those with a large number of user complaints, or those providing false information usually carry higher risks. You can check the broker's regulatory status, overall rating, exposure records, and user reviews on the WikiFX platform, and make judgments based on multi-dimensional data to effectively identify and avoid scam platform risks.

Recovering funds after investment fraud can be difficult, but taking timely action may still help recover part of the losses. It is recommended to take the following actions immediately: keep trading records, chat records, and other evidence; contact the bank to try to stop or freeze the payment; report the case to local law enforcement agencies. In addition, investors can also use WikiFX complaint and exposure channels to increase the visibility of problematic platforms and improve the efficiency of rights protection.

Common forex regulatory authorities include the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the United States, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). These regulatory authorities usually maintain relatively high regulatory standards, and brokers regulated by them generally have higher compliance levels. You can check broker ranking lists under different regulators on the WikiFX platform, such as brokers regulated by FCA, ASIC, and CySEC, so as to compare brokers under different regulatory backgrounds more clearly and make safer choices.

If a broker holds multiple regulatory licenses, it usually means that it operates in multiple countries or regions and needs to comply with the requirements of different regulatory authorities. Its overall credibility is generally higher. However, it should be noted that regulatory strength differs between licenses. Some offshore regulations have weaker restrictions, so safety should not be judged only by the number of licenses. It is recommended to focus on whether the broker holds licenses from major regulators such as FCA or ASIC, and evaluate its regulatory status, historical records, and overall rating together. You can also check all regulatory information and performance under different regulators on the WikiFX platform to more comprehensively assess its actual risk level.