Najm Capital Review 2026: UAE-Facing Broker, but the Licence Picture Raises Questions
Najm Capital shows a low WikiFX score, limited licence scope, and visible UAE-facing activity without clear local brokerage permission.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:24Markets review 2026: WikiFX score 5.38/10, FSCA license concerns, Mauritius FSC record that does not cover forex, CNMV warning, and negative user complaints.

24Markets is a CFD broker launched in 2014 and presented as operating out of South Africa. It offers trading in forex, indices, commodities, stocks, crypto, and CFDs, and supports MT5, web-based trading, and a mobile app.
Its account structure is built around three live account types — Discovery, Prime, and Master. The minimum deposit starts from $100, leverage goes up to 1:500 depending on account type, and spreads begin from 1.5 pips on Discovery, 0.8 pips on Prime, and 0.3 pips on Master. No direct commission is stated for these account types, while swap-free trading is offered for a limited period on higher-tier accounts.

From a product perspective, the setup is broad enough for retail traders. But the more important issue in a 24Markets review is not the product list. It is the brokers regulatory presentation, the scope of the licenses linked to the brand, and the warning signals already attached to its profile.

The full broker page is here:
https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/3850361771.html
24Markets currently holds a WikiFX score of 5.38/10.
The rating breakdown shown on the broker profile includes:

This is not a bottom-tier score, but it is not a strong one either. The software and business side appear more developed than the regulatory side, and that imbalance is one of the main reasons the brokers profile needs closer review.
The license structure around 24Markets is one of the most important parts of this review.
24Markets is linked to an FSCA South Africa Derivatives Trading License (EP), issued to FIGTREE CAPITAL (PTY) LTD, license number 51524.

At the same time, the broker is also linked to an FSC Mauritius Securities Trading License (EP) issued to P24 Capital Markets LTD, license number GB23202449.

The key point is scope. The FSCA record is the forex-relevant license in the profile. The Mauritius FSC record does not cover forex-related business, and the certificate itself states that it does not authorize forex trading. That means the Mauritius record should not be presented as a forex license.
This distinction matters because part of the concern around 24Markets is not the absence of records, but the way the regulatory picture is presented. A broker can hold one relevant license and still create confusion if another record is shown in a broader way than its actual scope allows.
In 2024, Spains financial regulator CNMV added 24MARKETS.COM to its warning list, stating that the entity was not authorized to provide investment services.
This is a significant regulatory warning. It does not erase the existence of the broker‘s linked FSCA record, but it does show that the broker’s operating status is not accepted equally across jurisdictions.
For any serious discussion of 24Markets license, the CNMV warning is part of the picture.
The negative review section is another pressure point in this brokers profile.
The complaints shown on WikiFX are not limited to one type of dissatisfaction. They include allegations of heavy losses, concerns about account handling, and accusations that the trading experience did not match what users expected after depositing large amounts.
One visible complaint titled 1 STAR – My Real Experience (Sharing Honestly) describes a user who said they deposited around $45,000 over multiple transactions and remained in regular contact with the companys team. According to the complaint, the user later felt pressured to keep adding funds and came away with a strongly negative impression of the overall experience.

Another complaint titled Fraud and scam. is shorter, but still reflects a clearly negative user conclusion after trading on the platform.

These reviews do not settle every case on their own. But they do add weight to the broader concerns already raised by the brokers regulatory presentation and the CNMV warning.
Compared with industry standards, 24Markets sits in the moderate-to-higher cost range for smaller accounts. Entry-level spreads are wider than what many traders would expect from lower-cost forex brokers, and the fee structure is not fully transparent in all areas.
Spreads become tighter on higher-tier accounts, but that comes with significantly higher deposit requirements. Swap-free access is time-limited, and overnight financing details are not fully disclosed in a way that makes advanced comparison easy.
From a practical point of view, this means the broker may look more attractive in headline marketing than in full cost structure.
24Markets does not appear as a broker with no regulatory records at all. It has an FSCA-linked forex-relevant license, and that is the strongest part of its profile.
At the same time, the broker does not present a clean trust picture. Its overall score is moderate rather than strong, one of its linked regulatory records does not authorize forex trading, Spains CNMV has issued a formal warning, and the negative user review section adds further pressure.
That leaves the broker in a category where caution is still necessary.
A balanced 24Markets review leads to a qualified conclusion.
The broker offers a familiar retail trading package: MT5 access, web trading, multiple account tiers, and broad CFD coverage. But the stronger commercial presentation is not matched by an equally strong trust profile. The most important issues are the brokers uneven regulatory picture, the limited scope of the Mauritius record, the CNMV blacklist warning in Spain, and the negative user complaints.
For anyone checking 24Markets rating, 24Markets license, or broader trust concerns around the brand, the practical takeaway is simple: look closely at the exact legal entity, the exact license that applies to the account, and the most recent complaint record before making any deposit.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Najm Capital shows a low WikiFX score, limited licence scope, and visible UAE-facing activity without clear local brokerage permission.

9X Markets review 2026: WikiFX score 1.98/10, no forex license, limited UAE advisory license, Mauritius FSC record, and complaints centered in Pakistan and India.

Alpari review 2026: WikiFX score 2.53/10, Belarus license, repeated user complaints, mixed field survey results, and blacklist warnings in multiple jurisdictions.

DBinvesting review 2026: WikiFX score 2.15/10, Seychelles offshore license, UAE advisory license that does not cover forex, mixed field survey results, and recurring user complaints.