Retiree loses over RM337,000 in Facebook investment scam
Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Police in Sarikei identify four bank account owners linked to online scams, with victims losing over RM475,000 in investment and tender frauds.

Police have identified four individuals whose bank accounts were used to receive funds in two recent online fraud cases in Sarikei, although no arrests have been made so far.
Sarikei district police chief Superintendent Aswandy Anis said the accounts were registered under company names that are not operating in the district, raising further suspicion over how they were used. Investigations are ongoing under Section 420 of the Penal Code for cheating. He added that account holders who knowingly allowed their accounts to be used by others could also face charges under Section 424C(1) of the Penal Code (Amendment 2024).
One of the cases involved a contractor in his 50s who lost about RM460,000 after falling for a fake online investment scheme earlier this month. The second case involved a private pharmacy officer in his 30s, who was cheated of around RM15,000 after being offered a tender to supply medical equipment in Sarikei.
In the latter case, the victim lodged a police report yesterday after realising he had been duped. Superintendent Aswandy said the victim had been contacted by a man posing as an officer from the Sarawak Social Welfare Department. Believing the offer to be genuine, the victim made several payments into two different bank accounts.
However, the promised medical equipment never arrived, and the suspect later blocked the victims phone number and cut off all contact. Police have urged the public to remain cautious of unsolicited investment or tender offers, especially those that require upfront payments.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment

Failed to withdraw funds from the BDSWISS trading account despite multiple attempts? Did the broker reject your fund withdrawal application without any reason? Did the high slippage lead to massive capital losses? Was the customer support team far from ideal? Many traders have reported these issues online. In this BDSWISS review article, we have examined several such complaints against the forex broker.

When your capital is at risk, trust isn't just a feeling - it's something you can measure. For traders thinking about using the broker Evest, one question is impossible to avoid: Is Evest a trusted partner for your investments, or does it put your investments at serious risk? The answer to this important question, "Is Evest Safe or Scam?", isn't found in the company's ads. You find it by comparing what the broker officially says with the real, often worrying experiences of actual users. This review won't rely on guessing. Instead, we'll take a deep look at the broker's legal status and, more importantly, the number and types of real Evest complaints. Our research is based on public information, mainly from the worldwide broker research platform, WikiFX, to show the truth about Evest's reputation.

XPO Markets, a Comoros-based brokerage entity, is in the news for negative reasons. These include the alleged INR 3,100 crore fund scam complaint filed by 3 lakh Indians in November 2025. Such a scam puts a serious question mark on the authenticity of this forex broker. In this XPO Markets review article, we have highlighted the million-dollar scam along with the risk parameters associated with this broker.