Retiree loses over RM337,000 in Facebook investment scam
Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:For a period of time, WikiFX has received a growing number of complaints from traders around the world, reporting that TenX Prime has defrauded more than USD 3,000,000. The latest report came from a trader, who shared his experience and concerns through an email to WikiFX.

For a period of time, WikiFX has received a growing number of complaints from traders around the world, reporting that TenX Prime has defrauded more than USD 3,000,000. The latest report came from a trader, who shared his experience and concerns through an email to WikiFX.
According to this investor, TenX Prime Ltd operated a PAMM (Percent Allocation Management Module) investment system where traders could invest under selected fund managers. One fund manager of this broker, Chris Anderson, reportedly managed a Telegram group named “Chris the Gold Father,” which had over 700 investors at the time.
The trader stated that he first invested USD 100 in August 2024, impressed by the trading results shared by a TenX Prime staff named Chris Anderson. Later, he increased his investment to USD 6,095 in September 2025, believing that larger deposits would bring higher profits.
However, beginning October 1, 2025, the TenX Prime PAMM system stopped responding entirely. Investors are unable to access their accounts, check balances, or make withdrawals.
Despite repeated attempts to contact customer support, TenX Prime has only issued automatic or vague replies, claiming the issue is “under maintenance.” No concrete updates or timelines have been provided to affected users.
“The TenX Prime support team only sends automatic or unclear replies, saying the issue is being fixed, but there has been no progress or concrete update. Now over 1200 investors, including myself, are worried this could be a scam,” the victim said.





Reports indicate that more than 1,200 investors have been affected by the platforms sudden inactivity. The PAMM system outage has persisted for over two weeks with no transparency from the broker.
These developments have raised critical questions among traders:
According to the WikiFX, TenX Prime holds a low trust score, showing significant risk to investors. The brokers regulatory status is unclear, and no verified licenses have been identified from recognized financial authorities.

WikiFX is currently reaching out to victims and other affected traders to collect more evidence and better understand the scope of the issue. WikiFX continues to monitor the situation and urges all affected investors to report their experiences through the official WikiFX channels.
Protecting the legitimate rights and interests of forex traders is always the primary concern of WikiFX. Cases like TenX Prime highlight the importance of verifying a brokers license and operational transparency before investing.
WikiFX reminds all traders to remain cautious when engaging with brokers that:
To safeguard your funds and trading accounts, always verify a broker‘s legitimacy through WikiFX’s official website or app. WikiFX provides detailed reports, regulatory verification, and user feedback to help traders make informed decisions.
Visit https://www.wikifx.com/en
Or https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html for instant access to broker ratings and real-time scam alerts.
The TenX Prime case serves as a warning about the dangers of unregulated brokers and high-risk investment schemes. As more investors report losses and the PAMM system remains offline, the evidence increasingly suggests a potential scam operation.
WikiFX will continue to track updates, expose unethical brokers, and provide guidance for traders seeking justice. Stay tuned for further developments.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment

Failed to withdraw funds from the BDSWISS trading account despite multiple attempts? Did the broker reject your fund withdrawal application without any reason? Did the high slippage lead to massive capital losses? Was the customer support team far from ideal? Many traders have reported these issues online. In this BDSWISS review article, we have examined several such complaints against the forex broker.

When your capital is at risk, trust isn't just a feeling - it's something you can measure. For traders thinking about using the broker Evest, one question is impossible to avoid: Is Evest a trusted partner for your investments, or does it put your investments at serious risk? The answer to this important question, "Is Evest Safe or Scam?", isn't found in the company's ads. You find it by comparing what the broker officially says with the real, often worrying experiences of actual users. This review won't rely on guessing. Instead, we'll take a deep look at the broker's legal status and, more importantly, the number and types of real Evest complaints. Our research is based on public information, mainly from the worldwide broker research platform, WikiFX, to show the truth about Evest's reputation.

Investigate Market10’s regulation status and recent user allegations. Learn why caution is advised with this Forex broker. Read our Market10 review now!