Copy-Paste Broker Scams: How Template Websites Are Used to Impersonate Regulated FX Firms
An in-depth look at a scalable fraud method in the forex sector, built on reusing the same website structure under different brand names.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Federal court finalizes $3.4M penalty and lifetime ban in Daniel Winston LaMarco Ponzi-style forex case; CFTC highlights investor protection and enforcement.

A federal court in New York entered final judgment against Daniel Winston LaMarco, imposing $3,450,400 in monetary relief and permanently banning him from all commodity-related activity for orchestrating a Ponzi-style foreign exchange scheme. The order requires $862,600 in restitution to victims and a $2,587,800 civil monetary penalty, closing the Commodity Futures Trading Commissions seven-year enforcement action that began in July 2017.
Judge Diane Gujarati of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York adopted findings that LaMarco committed forex fraud and commodity pool operator fraud, and entered a permanent injunction barring future violations of the Commodity Exchange Act. The final judgment followed a series of rulings, including a September 4, 2024, summary judgment on liability and a July 10, 2025, remedies order, both tied to Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks recommendations.
According to the court record, LaMarco solicited nearly $1.5 million from friends and acquaintances to trade forex contracts via a commodity pool run through GDLogix, Inc., then lost nearly all of it through personal trading while diverting about $630,050 as purported profits to earlier participants in a Ponzi-like fashion. The court concluded he misappropriated funds, made material misrepresentations, and conducted no trading on behalf of pool participants, despite issuing false monthly statements.

GDLogix, Inc., LaMarco‘s company, received a parallel default judgment imposing identical monetary penalties—$862,600 restitution and $2,587,800 in civil penalties—along with permanent registration and trading bans. The corporate default was entered after GDLogix failed to retain counsel and respond, with the court granting the CFTC’s default request and later imposing final remedies.
In addition to remedies for fraud, the court sanctioned LaMarco in June 2025 for filing repetitive defamatory allegations against the CFTC and threatening agency counsel, striking portions of his filings and finding his conduct inexcusable and in bad faith. Those sanctions factored into the courts assessment of his litigation behavior and reinforced the need for permanent injunctive relief.
The civil judgment follows LaMarcos related criminal case, in which he pleaded guilty to commodities fraud and wire fraud and received a 42-month prison sentence with $872,600 in restitution on February 3, 2017. The CFTC reiterated that restitution orders may not result in recovery if a defendant lacks assets, but emphasized ongoing enforcement to protect customers and ensure accountability.
These outcomes demonstrate how courts and the CFTC respond to Ponzi-style foreign exchange scheme conviction matters, combining restitution-focused remedies with protective injunctions to safeguard investors and preserve market integrity.
Stay tuned for the latest news from the financial authority to stay vigilant. Scan the QR code below to download and install the WikiFX app on your smartphone.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

An in-depth look at a scalable fraud method in the forex sector, built on reusing the same website structure under different brand names.

Fidelity Investments has been grabbing attention of late for negative reasons. These include complaints concerning withdrawals, account closure without notice, technical glitches in trade order processing, and inept customer support service. As the complaints continue to grow, we prepared a Fidelity review article showcasing some of them. Read on as we share details.

Does ICE FX ask you to pay taxes for fund withdrawal access? Were you made to pay a hefty fee on a verification failure? Does the broker deliberately cancel your profitable trades? Have you failed to receive assistance from the ICE FX customer support team on your fund deposit and withdrawal queries? These issues have become common for its traders. Many of them have highlighted these issues online. In this ICE FX review article, we have investigated some of their complaints. Read on as we dive deep.

Scams aren’t getting smarter — they’re getting more human. Even experienced investors are losing big money. Why does this keep happening in Malaysia while Singapore takes a different path?