Retiree loses over RM337,000 in Facebook investment scam
Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:CFTC secures $451.6M settlement against offshore entities and individuals for binary options fraud, including BigOption, BinaryBook, and BinaryOnline.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has won a significant win in a worldwide binary options fraud case, with a federal court ordering five offshore corporations and three persons to pay $451.6 million in restitution and penalties. The defendants were found guilty of fraud and other breaches of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and CFTC rules by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, which imposed a default judgment against them. The fraudulent activity, which targeted citizens of the United States, was carried out using websites with false trade names including BigOption, BinaryBook, and BinaryOnline.
Among the defendants are:
Yossi Herzog, Lee Elbaz, and Shalom Peretz, all Israeli citizens, were also convicted guilty in connection with the conspiracy. The offenders were sentenced to pay 112.9 million in compensation to misled consumers, as well as a 338.7 million civil monetary penalty. The defendants are also permanently barred from registering with the CFTC or trading in CFTC-regulated markets.

The CFTC's lawsuit, filed on August 12, 2019, claimed that the defendants engaged in fraudulent actions from March 26, 2014, until the complaint was filed. The defendants defrauded clients by fraudulently representing that binary options trading was profitable via websites, emails, and phone conversations. In actuality, the vast majority of clients incurred losses. In order to acquire consumers' trust, the defendants falsified their names, financial competence, and locations.
The defendants were found to have stolen client cash and altered the risk parameters on their trading platform such that consumers seldom made successful transactions. They also utilized fraudulent techniques to deter consumers from withdrawing cash, such as omitting to disclose essential information concerning “bonuses” and “risk-free trades.” These actions enabled the defendants to benefit at the cost of innocent investors.
This action comes after a prior settlement with Yakov Cohen, another defendant in the scam. As part of a settlement judgment that resolved identical claims, Cohen was forced to disgorge $7 million in ill-gotten gains.
The CFTC's enforcement action demonstrates its commitment to combatting fraudulent binary options schemes and safeguarding US customers from financial abuse. According to CFTC Director of Enforcement James McDonald, “This case demonstrates the CFTC's commitment to holding fraudsters accountable, regardless of where they operate.” We will continue to collaborate with our foreign partners to combat corruption in global markets.
The decision serves as a stern message to people and businesses who engage in dishonest financial operations. The CFTC advises investors to proceed with caution when dealing with unregulated firms and to check the validity of trading platforms before investing.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment

Failed to withdraw funds from the BDSWISS trading account despite multiple attempts? Did the broker reject your fund withdrawal application without any reason? Did the high slippage lead to massive capital losses? Was the customer support team far from ideal? Many traders have reported these issues online. In this BDSWISS review article, we have examined several such complaints against the forex broker.

When your capital is at risk, trust isn't just a feeling - it's something you can measure. For traders thinking about using the broker Evest, one question is impossible to avoid: Is Evest a trusted partner for your investments, or does it put your investments at serious risk? The answer to this important question, "Is Evest Safe or Scam?", isn't found in the company's ads. You find it by comparing what the broker officially says with the real, often worrying experiences of actual users. This review won't rely on guessing. Instead, we'll take a deep look at the broker's legal status and, more importantly, the number and types of real Evest complaints. Our research is based on public information, mainly from the worldwide broker research platform, WikiFX, to show the truth about Evest's reputation.

XPO Markets, a Comoros-based brokerage entity, is in the news for negative reasons. These include the alleged INR 3,100 crore fund scam complaint filed by 3 lakh Indians in November 2025. Such a scam puts a serious question mark on the authenticity of this forex broker. In this XPO Markets review article, we have highlighted the million-dollar scam along with the risk parameters associated with this broker.