Retiree loses over RM337,000 in Facebook investment scam
Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has penalized NinjaTrader Clearing, LLC (NTC) with a fine of $983,425 for failing to adequately supervise its employees in handling accounts tied to fraudulent activities.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has penalized NinjaTrader Clearing, LLC (NTC) with a fine of $983,425 for failing to adequately supervise its employees in handling accounts tied to fraudulent activities. The Illinois-based futures commission merchant was found to have neglected its responsibility to oversee these accounts, which were flagged due to suspicion of fraud.
According to the CFTC, NinjaTrader did not act swiftly when it was ordered by a statutory restraining order (SRO) to freeze or restrict the affected accounts. The company's delay in taking action allowed the accounts to continue trading, resulting in additional losses exceeding $200,000 from open positions, further aggravating the financial damage linked to the fraudulent operations.

The regulator cited the lack of proper internal controls and emergency response procedures as a major factor in the failure. Beginning in late 2020, NinjaTrader reportedly did not put in place effective measures to manage court orders involving flagged accounts. Even after receiving the SRO in January 2022, the firm allowed the suspect accounts to remain active, contributing to ongoing financial losses.
As part of the settlement, NTC agreed to pay a civil fine of $750,000 and an additional $233,425 in restitution. This restitution will be allocated to victims who were affected by the fraudulent activities connected to the case.
This enforcement follows a similar regulatory action by the CFTC, which recently fined Nasdaq Futures $22 million for violations tied to its incentive programs. Nasdaq Futures, a former designated contract market (DCM) that operated between July 2015 and July 2018, offered an incentive program called the DMM (Designated Market Maker) program.
Although the firm disclosed a fixed stipend for market makers, the CFTC found that it failed to properly disclose a volume-based payment structure that rewarded certain users, thereby violating regulations. Additionally, the regulator noted that Nasdaq Futures provided inaccurate information during its inquiries into the matter.
These recent penalties reflect the CFTC's ongoing efforts to enforce compliance in the commodities and futures markets. By holding firms accountable for lapses in oversight and transparency, the regulator aims to maintain the integrity of the financial system and protect investors from harmful practices.
Market participants are urged to remain compliant and ensure that their operational procedures align with regulatory standards to avoid similar enforcement actions in the future.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment

Failed to withdraw funds from the BDSWISS trading account despite multiple attempts? Did the broker reject your fund withdrawal application without any reason? Did the high slippage lead to massive capital losses? Was the customer support team far from ideal? Many traders have reported these issues online. In this BDSWISS review article, we have examined several such complaints against the forex broker.

When your capital is at risk, trust isn't just a feeling - it's something you can measure. For traders thinking about using the broker Evest, one question is impossible to avoid: Is Evest a trusted partner for your investments, or does it put your investments at serious risk? The answer to this important question, "Is Evest Safe or Scam?", isn't found in the company's ads. You find it by comparing what the broker officially says with the real, often worrying experiences of actual users. This review won't rely on guessing. Instead, we'll take a deep look at the broker's legal status and, more importantly, the number and types of real Evest complaints. Our research is based on public information, mainly from the worldwide broker research platform, WikiFX, to show the truth about Evest's reputation.

Investigate Market10’s regulation status and recent user allegations. Learn why caution is advised with this Forex broker. Read our Market10 review now!