Retiree loses over RM337,000 in Facebook investment scam
Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:ASIC issues stop orders to prevent Trademax from selling CFDs and FX to unsuitable retail investors.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has intervened to safeguard retail investors by imposing two temporary stop orders on Trademax Australia Limited. These restrictions prohibit the financial services business from establishing new accounts or conducting contracts for difference (CFDs) or margin foreign exchange contracts (margin FX) with individual investors.
This decisive move is in response to concerns that Trademax has not met fundamental investor protection criteria. ASIC specifically noted difficulties with Trademax's retail product distribution, which seems to be inconsistent with the company's target market determinations (TMD). These TMDs are important because they determine who the products are appropriate for depending on the investor's financial status, investing goals, and risk tolerance.
The basis of ASIC's concerns focuses on Trademax's insufficient questionnaire for screening new customers. The regulator said that the questionnaire failed to adequately analyze potential customers' financial situation and risk tolerance, notably for high-risk, leveraged products like CFDs and margin FX. Furthermore, the questionnaire proved insufficient to assess consumers' awareness of CFDs involving crypto assets, despite the considerable risk associated with such products.

There were more difficulties with the questionnaire's design. It gave customers many chances to offer appropriate replies, possibly qualifying investors who did not satisfy the target market requirements. Furthermore, the questionnaire pushed users with caution to examine their replies if they did not immediately qualify, indicating a design that was more concerned with obtaining approvals than with determining eligibility.
The issuing of these stop orders, which are effective for 21 days unless reversed sooner, demonstrates ASIC's determination to enforce its design and distribution requirements. These laws require financial product issuers and distributors to adopt actions that are likely to correspond with the intended target market.
The intervention follows ASIC's Report 770, which was issued on September 6, 2023, and assesses retail OTC derivatives issuers' adherence to these responsibilities. The paper critiques the over-reliance on client surveys as the main technique for establishing client eligibility and recommends better use of existing data to improve distribution tactics.
This is not ASIC's first step at improving consumer safeguards in the CFD business. The regulator's continuing product intervention order for CFDs, which was implemented in response to results from 2017 to 2020 that demonstrated a high frequency of losses among retail customers, was recently extended until May 23, 2027. This ruling is part of a larger effort to protect retail investors against potentially hazardous financial products that may not meet their requirements or financial objectives.
To date, ASIC has issued 86 interim and one final stop orders under the design and distribution requirements, demonstrating its close monitoring of the financial markets. By pursuing such steps, ASIC strives to guarantee that financial markets run honestly and fairly, avoiding situations in which regular investors are exposed to unnecessary risk.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment

Failed to withdraw funds from the BDSWISS trading account despite multiple attempts? Did the broker reject your fund withdrawal application without any reason? Did the high slippage lead to massive capital losses? Was the customer support team far from ideal? Many traders have reported these issues online. In this BDSWISS review article, we have examined several such complaints against the forex broker.

When your capital is at risk, trust isn't just a feeling - it's something you can measure. For traders thinking about using the broker Evest, one question is impossible to avoid: Is Evest a trusted partner for your investments, or does it put your investments at serious risk? The answer to this important question, "Is Evest Safe or Scam?", isn't found in the company's ads. You find it by comparing what the broker officially says with the real, often worrying experiences of actual users. This review won't rely on guessing. Instead, we'll take a deep look at the broker's legal status and, more importantly, the number and types of real Evest complaints. Our research is based on public information, mainly from the worldwide broker research platform, WikiFX, to show the truth about Evest's reputation.

Investigate Market10’s regulation status and recent user allegations. Learn why caution is advised with this Forex broker. Read our Market10 review now!