You Must Know How These Psychological Traps Destroy Financial Judgment
Every aspiring forex trader begins with a powerful vision of financial freedom. Yet despite this promise, most traders struggle to achieve consistent success.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Jonathan Stempel's NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. Prosecutors in the United States have filed criminal accusations of commodities fraud and manipulation against a man suspected of attempting to steal around $110 million in October by manipulating the Mango Markets cryptocurrency exchange.

Jonathan Stempel's NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. Prosecutors in the United States have filed criminal accusations of commodities fraud and manipulation against a man suspected of attempting to steal around $110 million in October by manipulating the Mango Markets cryptocurrency exchange.
Avraham Eisenberg's trading in futures relating to Mango's crypto token MNGO allowed him to take $110 million in cryptocurrencies from other investors' accounts, according to a lawsuit made public on Tuesday in Manhattan federal court.
Eisenberg could not be contacted for comment immediately, and it is unknown if he has a lawyer.
Mango is a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange hosted by Mango DAO that allows investors to lend, borrow, swap, and trade bitcoin assets using leverage.
According to the Dec. 23 complaint filed by FBI Special Agent Brandon Racz, Eisenberg utilized two accounts on Oct. 11 to purchase and sell futures based on the relative prices of MNGO and the stablecoin USD Coin (USDC).
Eisenberg intentionally raised the price of MNGO compared to USDC by being on both sides of the transaction, enabling him to borrow and then withdraw $110 million in various cryptocurrencies, according to the lawsuit.
Mango quickly launched discussions with Eisenberg and achieved a $67 million settlement.
“All mango depositors will be made whole,” with token holders who vote on the settlement promising not to “pursue any criminal investigations or freeze of funds after the tokens are paid back,” a community post stated at the time.
According to the lawsuit, Eisenberg claimed responsibility for the transaction and tweeted on Oct. 15 that “the exchange this took place on, Mango Markets, fell bankrupt.”
“I think all of our acts were lawful open market actions, utilizing the protocol as intended, even if the development team did not completely foresee all of the repercussions of setting parameters the way they are,” he said on Twitter.
Mango could not be contacted for comment right away. The Manhattan office of U.S. Attorney Damian Williams did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
The case is United States v. Eisenberg, Southern District of New York, No. 22-MJ-10337.
Follow us for the more latest news.
Download and install the WikiFX App from the download link below to stay updated on the latest news.
Download link: https://www.wikifx.com/en/download.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Every aspiring forex trader begins with a powerful vision of financial freedom. Yet despite this promise, most traders struggle to achieve consistent success.

This VT Markets review provides a comprehensive analysis of the broker’s regulatory framework, licensing coverage, and overall standing based on information available on WikiFX.

Failing to withdraw your funds earned on the FXDD platform because of technical glitches? Do your emails seeking clarification on stuck funds come unanswered from the Malta-based forex broker? Have you even encountered deposit credit failures and received almost a muted response from the customer support official? These issues have allegedly become headlines on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. This FXDD review article thus aims to uncover everything about the brokerage entity, including user complaints. Read on!

Principal presents a deeply concerning profile for forex traders, with an overwhelmingly negative track record that demands serious attention before considering any investment. With an overall rating of just 2.3 out of 10 based on 21 reviews, this broker exhibits a troubling 95.2% negative rate, with 20 out of 21 reviews expressing dissatisfaction. While Principal may carry some recognition for having a good reputation and being considered safe in certain contexts, these perceived strengths are dramatically overshadowed by critical operational failures that directly impact traders' financial security. The most pressing issues center around systematic withdrawal delays and rejections, which represent the primary complaint among users and raise immediate red flags about fund accessibility. Read on!