UbitMarkets Review: Is This Broker a Scam? See 2025 Cases!
Wondering if UbitMarkets is safe? Our review uncovers the truth about UbitMarkets regulation and 2025 scam cases. Stay informed and protect your funds today!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The failure occurred between June 2018 and February 2020. FINRA recently fined RBC Capital Markets $90k over anticipatory hedging violations.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has hit RBC Capital Markets, a Toronto-headquartered global investment bank, with a censure order and monetary fine of $360,000 for the failure of its supervisory system between June 2018 and February 2020.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
The bank, whose principal place of business is in New York, the United States, provides securities transaction and clearance services to its customers and those of its introducing brokers.
FINRA, a membership-based self-regulatory body, said the penalty is for the company‘s failure to “timely or reasonably monitor thousands of employee outside brokerage account statements for compliance with the firm’s trading restrictions” within the period.
The restrictions relate to RBC Capital Markets policies on pre-clearance and holding periods, among others.
The private American regulator said the financial services provider contravened FINRA Rules 3110 and 2010 which demand the supervision of associated persons working for its members firms and also the maintenance of high standards in dealings.
Earlier in June, FINRA also slammed a censure order and a monetary penalty of $90,000 on RBC Capital Markets following Cboe Exchange's allegation of anticipatory hedging allegations against the company.
According to FINRA, RBC Capital Markets between June 2018 and February 2020 failed to put in place a reasonably designed supervisory system, including written supervisory procedures, to timely review paper statements from employees' outside accounts.
“For example, the firm had no prescribed timeframe to track, reconcile, and review statements. As a result, and due to the manual nature of the paper statement review process, personnel turnover, and outdated technology systems, as of February 2020, the firm had a backlog of approximately 8,950 unreviewed account statements, with some dating as far back as June 2018,” FINRA explained.
The review of the backlog was not completed until February 2021, FINRA said.
The financial watchdog further disclosed that RBC Capital Markets manually tracked receipt of paper statements, had no system in place to notify the firm or employees that statements were missing, and had no procedure for following up on missing statements.
“As a result, in some instances, the firm did not receive paper statements for review. For example, after the firm identified the backlog of unreviewed statements described above, it discovered that approximately 2,600 additional statements had not been mailed to the firm,” the markets supervisor said.
Meanwhile, FINRA recently slapped a $100,000 fine on Dealerweb Inc., an operator of an electronic interdealer platform for mortgage-backed securities.
Dealerweb inaccurately reported approximately 180,000 transactions in TRACE-eligible securities to the FINRA Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE) between July 2016 and December 2020, the regulator said.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Wondering if UbitMarkets is safe? Our review uncovers the truth about UbitMarkets regulation and 2025 scam cases. Stay informed and protect your funds today!

Concerned about ForexDana? Explore recent scam reports and the dangers of unregulated ForexDana broker trading. Protect your investments – read our review now!

Axiory is a trading company that started in 2012. It says it offers different ways to trade with easy-to-use platforms. The company has been around for around 15 years and tries to attract traders by promising low starting amounts and high leverage. However, when we look more closely at this broker, we find some serious problems. WikiFX, a website that checks trading companies around the world, gave Axiory a very low score of only 2.45 out of 10. This low score is based on real data and shows that there are major issues with this company. This review takes a deep look at why Axiory got such a bad rating. We will examine how well the company is regulated, look at real complaints from users, and check their trading rules. Our goal is to give traders the facts they need to make a safe choice, especially since there is a clear "High potential risk" warning about this broker.

Discover the truth in our MONAXA review. With no valid regulation and rising 2025 scam cases, learn why you must avoid MONAXA login and trading.