Acetop UK Reports 2025 Loss as Trading Volumes Drop to $9.5 Billion
Acetop Financial Limited posted a £35,691 pretax loss in 2025 after revenue declined and trading volumes fell 21% to about $9.5 billion.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Bitcoin miners are still offloading their assets fostering fears that a final capitulation could be on the cards very soon while some companies simply may not survive.

Public BTC mining companies are still selling their stashes.
Those with the lowest production costs and debts will likely survive.
Many mining firms will be forced to sell their hardware to others.
Bitcoin miners have been liquidating their assets over the past couple of months, with exchange inflows steadily increasing, according to data from MacroHive. This has added to the downward pressure on BTC and crypto markets, resulting in the asset falling 74% from its all-time high to just below $18,000 on June 19.
Analysis from Arcane Research revealed that several publically listed mining companies sold 100% of their entire output in May, according to Reuters.
“The conditions have worsened in June, meaning they are likely selling even more,” added Arcane analyst Jaran Mellerud.
Joe Burnett, an analyst at Bitcoin mining firm Blockware Solutions, told the outlet that conditions have worsened for miners over the past six months. Difficulty and hash rate (network computing power) have increased along with energy prices, while BTC prices have fallen over the same period. “These are both negatives for existing miners as both work to compress margins,” he added.
Several publically listed mining firms, including Bitfarms (BITF), Riot Blockchain (RIOT), and Core Scientific (CORZ), have already announced sales, but Marathon Digital (MARA) has yet to offload any.
On June 27, Mellerud posted his research into public miner cash flows and balance sheets to determine which ones are likely to survive the crypto winter. Direct BTC production cost impacts a miners operating cash flow, which ultimately determines when they are forced to power down machines; he noted before reporting:
“Stronghold and Argo have the lowest direct Bitcoin production costs, while Bitfarms and Hut 8 have the highest.”
Those with the more substantial operating cash flows, such as Core Scientific and Riot, are best positioned to pay upcoming expenses, such as debts and machine deliveries. Many, such as Marathon, also have hundreds of millions in cash outflows for machine repayments this year. However, Marathon does have a healthy balance sheet, he added.

A liquidity squeeze will force some miners to sell off some of their assets which could be good for others in better positions.
“In the midst of every crisis lies great opportunity, as the best-capitalized miners can buy the struggling miners assets cheaply.”
Mellerud concluded that Argo Blockchain was in the best position to survive while Marathon may be forced to liquidate their BTC or sell those upcoming machine orders.
The slump below $18,000 earlier this month is the first time in any crypto bear market that Bitcoin prices have fallen below their previous cycle peak.
Bitcoin is currently trading below key technical indicators, which could signify that markets are close to the bottom. Earlier this week, Glassnode analysts noted that BTC was trading below several models “which have coalesced around bear market floors in the past,”

Markets may be close to the bottom, but if previous cycles are anything to go by, theyre likely to stay there for some time yet especially if the macro-economic situation is slow to improve.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Acetop Financial Limited posted a £35,691 pretax loss in 2025 after revenue declined and trading volumes fell 21% to about $9.5 billion.

ORCA MARKETS, a Saint Lucia-based forex broker, is reportedly facing many complaints from users as of mid 2026. They frequently complain about the app that refuses to work properly for hours, preventing them from taking the right position to unleash market movement. Complaints have been made about fund losses and deposit failures on the platform. These allegations made it imperative to investigate the broker on different aspects, including the regulatory oversight. We have done so in this ORCA MARKETS review article.

Did your attempt to withdraw funds from the LOYAL PRIMUS platform lead to your account deactivation by the broker? Did the broker prevent you from withdrawing when you made profits? Did the broker cancel your withdrawal application by accusing you of suspicious trading activity? These allegations have grown in numbers on independent broker review tools such as WikiFX. In this LOYAL PRIMUS review article, we have examined all these allegations thoroughly.

Failed to withdraw funds from the Eurotrader platform despite repeated requests? Do you fail to trade due to persistent login issues? Has the customer support service failed to resolve the issue? Did you also face wide spreads that led to a massive profit reduction? All these user allegations have become strong headlines on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. Through this Eurotrader review article, we have shared the user allegations along with a regulatory overview.